Evaluating the performance of innovation accelerators in Iran; Survey based on logical model approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Prof., Faculty of Management and Accounting, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran

2 National research institute for science policy,

3 Allameh Tabataba'i University

Abstract

Objective: Developing a knowledge-based economy requires an ecosystem that provides the necessary platform for the growth and development of technological and innovative activities and businesses. One of the key players in this ecosystem in recent years is the "accelerator", which plays a central role in supporting and accelerating the growth of startups. Despite the rapid growth of these institutions in Iran's innovation ecosystem, it seems necessary to evaluate their performance and diagnose their strengths and weaknesses. Performance evaluations allow accelerators, policymakers, and other custodians of this field to gain a better understanding of needs and challenges and improve their work process accordingly.
Methods: This research is practical and employs descriptive and survey-based data collection. The logical model evaluates accelerators' performance based on four main components: inputs, activities, outputs, and consequences, as well as two categories of hard and soft environmental factors. Data for this study was collected by distributing a questionnaire among 29 accelerators and analyzing it using descriptive statistical methods.
Results: The results indicate that although a relatively favorable situation has been reported in some indicators related to inputs, activities, and outputs, there are concerns regarding other output indicators and, especially, outcomes. This includes the number of successful exits, the private sector, and venture capital funds, as well as the number of defined plans to address the problems of industries, government organizations, and social and regional challenges. Overall, performance in these areas is not satisfactory. Additionally, accelerators face serious challenges related to environmental factors, particularly laws, infrastructure, and access to financial resources.
Conclusion: Based on these findings, policy and management solutions have been proposed to improve the performance of accelerators, optimize processes, and strengthen their role. This includes a focus on establishing accelerators with a specialized, problem-oriented, and corporate approach within Iran's innovation ecosystem.

Keywords

References

منابع
پارسانژاد، محمدرضا؛ محمدی، عمران؛ نوری، مجتبی؛ حسینی نسب، شرف الدین؛ شاهچراغ، رشید (1398). ارزیابی عملکرد شتابدهنده های استارتاپی با استفاده از رویکرد ادغامی تحلیل پوششی داده ها و برنامه ریزی آرمانی. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی مدیریت فردا، سال هجدهم، صص 61-76.
خیاطیان، محمد صادق؛ ناظمی، علی؛ فرتاش، کیارش؛ پورعسگری، پدارم (1399). نفوذ فناوری و نوآوری در شرکت های بزرگ. نشر چاپار.
در مسیر توسعه زیست بوم کارآفرینی یا رویکرد تپش اقتصاد دانش بنیان در مدار دانشگاه صنعتی شریف. (1396). ناشر: دانش بنیان فناور. ستاد توسعه فرهنگ علم، فناوری و اقتصاد دانش بنیان، معاونت علمی و فناوری ریاست جمهوری.
رودی، امیر؛ میر، محمدرضا (1397). شاخص های کلیدی شتابدهنده ها در ایران. جامعه اندیشکده ها.
شفیعی علویجه، علی؛ اخلاقی، محمد؛ امیرآبادی فراهانی، مهدی (1402). ارائه بسته سیاستی جهت توسعه فعالیت و ارزیابی شتابدهنده ها. شرکت راه آوران ایده پرداز پارتاک.
صدری مهر، سید محمد جواد؛ محمدهاشمی، زهرا؛ نوبختی، مریم؛ لطفی،ایمان. (1402). دستورالعمل های ایجاد، توسعه و اعتباربخشی زیرساخت های زیست بوم نوآوری، انتشارات دانش بنیان فناور.
عبدالهی نسب، علی؛ اسدی فرد، رضا؛ خالدی، آرمان؛ صفوی جهرمی، گلایول (1398)، تبیین چالش های زیست بوم کسب وکارهای نوآورانه در ایران با تأکید بر نقش دولت، شانزدهمین کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران.
گودرزی، مهدی؛ نقی زاده، محمد؛ بیگلر، احسان (1397). عوامل موثر موفقیت شتابدهنده های حوزه زیست فناوری در ایران. فصلنامه مدیریت نوآوری. سال هفتم، شماره 2، صص 95-112.
قاضی نوری، سپهر. سجادی فر، مهدی، محمدهاشمی،زهرا.(1398).ارائه مدل منطقی ابزارهای سیاستی مالی و مالیاتی قانون حمایت از شرکتهای دانش بنیان،فصلنامه علمی-ترویجی رهیافت، دوره 29، شماره 76، صص67-84.
مشاور، فرشته؛ طالبی، کامبیز؛ داوری، علی؛ رشادت جو، حمیده (1402). نقش طراحی برنامه های شتابدهنده در نتایج جذب سرمایه توسط استارتاپ ها. فصلنامه توسعه کارآفرینی.
References
Christiansen, J. (2009). Copying Y Combinator, A framework for developing Seed Accelerator Programmes. Cambridge: University of Cambridge. (MBA Dissertation ad Judge Business School and Jesus College).
Cohen, S. (2013). What do accelerators do? Insights from incubators and angels. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 8(3-4), 19-25.
Cohen, S., & Hochberg, Y. (2014). Accelerating startups: The seed accelerator phenomenon. Published online at: http://scholarship. Richmond.edu/management- faculty publications.
Dempwolf, C. S., Auer, J. & D’lppolito, M. (2014). Innovation Accelerators, Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy.
Gliedt, T., Hoicka, C. E., & Jackson, N. (2018). Innovation intermediaries accelerating environmental sustainability transitions. Journal of cleaner production, 174, 1247–1261.
Hausberg, J. P., & Korreck, S. (2018). Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–26.
Hayes,H, Parchman,M, L and Howard, R(2011). A Logic Model Framework for Evaluation and Planning in a Primary Care Practice-based Research Network (PBRN). Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. Vol. 24 No. 5.
Heshmati, S. and Shafiee, M. (2021), "Pathology of acceleration programs in corporate accelerators of Iran", World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 405-416. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-03-2021-0033
Kim, J.-H. and Wagman, L. (2014), “Portfolio size and information disclosure: an analysis of startup
accelerators”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 29, pp. 520-534.
Mohammadi, N. and Sakhteh, S. (2023). Start-up accelerator value chain: a systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 73(2), pp.661-694.
McLaughlin,A.J, & Jordan, B. G.(1999).Logic Models: A Tool for Telling Your Program’s Performance Story, Evaluation and Program Planning, Volume 22, Number 1.
Miller, P., & Bound, K. (2011). The Startup Factories: The rise of Accelerator programmes to support new technology ventures. NESTA.
Midlands and Lancashire. (2016).using logic models in evaluation, commission support unit.
Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50, 13–24.
Radojevich-Kelley, N., & Hoffman, D. L. (2012). Analysis of Accelerator companies: An exploratory case study of their programs, processes, and early results. Small Business Institute Journal, 8(2), 54-70.
Shapira,ph and youtie.j(2014).Impact of Technology and Innovation  Advisory Services, Nesta Working Paper 13/19.
Schwartz, Michael., Goethnerb, Maximilian., Michelsenac, Claus., & Waldmannd, Nathalie. (2014). Startup Competitions as an Instrument of Entrepreneurship Policy: The German Experience. The German Experience, European Planning Studies, 21(10), 1578-1597. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722960.
Savaya. R., and Waysman, M. (2005). “The Logic Model: A Tool for Incorporating Theory in Development and Evaluation of Programs,” Administration in Social Work 29, no. 2: 85–103.
Taylor-power, ellen and henert,ellen,february(2008), developing a logic model: teaching and training guide, university of Wisconsin system.
Technopolis Group & Mioir (2012): Evaluation of Innovation Activities. Guidance on methods and practices. Study funded by the European Commission, Directorate for Regional Policy.
Van Huijgevoort, T. (2012). The ‘Business Accelerator’: Just a Different Name for a Business Incubator.
Wise, S., & Valliere, D. (2014). The impact on management experience on the performance of start-ups within accelerators. The Journal of Private Equity, 18(1), 9-19.
Innovation EconomicEcosystem Studies
Volume 4, Issue 2
September 2024
Pages 61-82

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics