Investigating the moderating role of innovation capability in the impact of political communication on environmental investment

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Accounting, Payame Noor, University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Accounting, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor of Accounting, payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. Email:

4 MSc in accounting, Department of Accounting, Azad University, Borujen, Iran.

Abstract

Among the problems that human societies face today due to industrialization are environmental issues. Sustainable development approaches are considered an important solution for stakeholders, and most companies undertake environmental, social, and governance (ESG) activities to achieve sustainable development. This guarantees the continuation of their activities in competitive markets. To fulfill their social responsibility, companies must invest a portion of their resources to mitigate environmental problems. Environmental investment in companies is a result of various factors such as legal requirements, reputation gain, accountability, and competitors' performance. The goal of the present study is to investigate the moderating role of innovation capability in the effect of political connections on the environmental investment of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. The data collected from 170 listed companies during the period of 2015 to 2022 (1394 to 1401 in the Persian calendar) were tested using the binary logit regression method. The research is applied in terms of objective, ex-post facto in nature, and utilizes descriptive-correlational methods for data analysis. The findings indicate that political connections have a positive and significant effect on environmental investment. Furthermore, the company's innovation capability weakens the positive effect of political connections on the sample companies' environmental investment.Based on the research findings, it can be concluded that political connections increase the motivation for social and environmental responsibility activities. Also, creating and improving innovation capability within the company's investments acts as a preventive tool, leading to a reduction in environmental costs and the enhancement of corporate competitiveness.

Keywords

References

منابع
ابراهیمی، سید کاظم، بهرامی‌نسب، علی و سجادی نسب، حسین. (1398). بررسی تأثیر ارتباطات سیاسی بر محافظه‌کاری ‌حسابداری، کارایی‌ سرمایه‌گذاری و هزینۀ تأمین ‌مالی. مجله دانش حسابداری،10(4)، 119-89.
 
ایمانی، کریم و گرزین مطاعی، پرستو. (1397). رابطه بین ارتباطات سیاسی سهامداران و نوآوری شرکت های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. کنفرانس ملی مدیریت، حسابداری و توسعه کسب و کار، ساری. 1-11.
 
تاری‌وردی، معصومه، داداشی نسب، مجید و قربانی، بهزاد. (1397). تأثیر ارتباطات سیاسی بیش اطمینانی مدیران بر شدت تحقیق توسعه در شرکت های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. کنفرانس ملی رهیافت های نوین در مدیریت، اقتصاد و حسابداری،تهران.
 
رضائی، زینب، تامرادی، علی و سپهری، ابراهیم. (1402). بررسی رابطه بین افشای اطلاعات زیست محیطی و هزینه‌های تحقیق و توسعه با تاکید بر نقش تعدیلی ارتباطات سیاسی هیات مدیره. مطالعات حسابداری و حسابرسی، 12(47)، 112-91.
 
رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون و محسنی، عبدالرضا. (1397). بررسی رابطه بین ارتباطات سیاسی شرکت ها با سود نقدی و بازده سهام در شرکت های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. دانش مالی تحلیل اوراق بهادار، 11(38)، 144-129.
 
شاه بداغی، راحله، مرادی، مجید و گرجی زاده، داود. (1402). تأثیر  فساد مالی بر پایداری زیست‌محیطی در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. اقتصاد مالی، 17(62)، 34-15.
کرمی شاهرخی، سعید، صفدری رنجبر، مصطفی و شهبازی، میثم. (1401). بررسی تأثیر  پیشران‌های نوآوری زیست‌محیطی بر عملکرد نوآورانه زیست محیطی؛ صنعت مس در ایران. فصلنامه مدیریت توسعه فناوری، 10(1)، 155-125.
رفیع زاده، هادی و برزگر، قدرت اله. (1394). بررسی تأثیر ارتباطات سیاسی هیئت‌مدیره بر رابطه بین کمیتۀ حسابرسی و حق‌الزحمه حسابرسی شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. دومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی پژوهش نوین در مدیریت، اقتصاد و علوم انسانی، 10-1.
مهدوی، غلامحسین، دریائی، عباسعلی، علیخانی، راضیه و مرانجوری، مهدی. (1394). بررسی رابطه بین اندازه شرکت، نوع صنعت و سودآوری با افشای اطلاعات حسابداری زیست محیطی و اجتماعی. پژوهش های تجربی حسابداری، 1(5)، 103-87.
 
 
 




References
 
Ben Fatma, H.; & Chouaibi, J. (2021). Corporate Governance and CSR Disclosure: Evidence from European Financial Institutions. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18, 346–361. doi:10.1057/s41310-021-00117-1.
Bertrand, M., Kramarz, F., Schoar, A., & Thesmar, D. (2018). The cost of political connections. Review of Finance, 22(3), 849–876. doi:10.1093/rof/rfy008.
Chang, L., Li, W., & Lu, X. (2015). Government engagement, environmental policy, and environmental performance: Evidence from the most polluting Chinese listed firms: Governmental impact on environmental policy and performance in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(1), 1–19. doi:10.1002/bse.1802.
Chen, Z. (2020). Mutual dependence and selective coercion: Corporate environmental investment among Chinese private firms. Chinese Sociological Review, 52(5), 515–538. doi:10.1080/21620555.2020.1768526,
Fan, G., Wang, X. & Zhu, H. (2007). NERI Index of Marketization for China’s Provinces: 2006 report, [in Chinese], Beijing: Economic Science Press.
Luo, X. R., & Wang, D. (2019). Are politically endorsed firms more socially responsible? Selective engagement in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(3), 535–555. doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04367-6.
Popp, D., & Newell, R. (2012). Where does energy R&D come from? Examining crowding out from energy R&D. Energy Economics, 34(4), 980–991. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2011.07.001.
Qian, W., & Chen, X. (2021). Corporate Environmental Disclosure and Political Connection in Regulatory and Leadership Changes: The Case of China. The British Accounting Review, 53(1),100935. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2020.100935.
 
Rahko, J. (2023). The effects of environmental investments on the economic performance of industrial plants– Evidence from Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production. 394. 136142. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136142.
Ren, S.G., Hu, Y.C., Zheng, J.J., & Wang, Y.J. (2020). Emissions trading and firm innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 155, 119989. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119989.
Song, L., Zou, L., & Liang, Q. (2023). Do political connections foster or hamper firm environmental investment? Economic research, 36(1), 2071-2089.‏ doi:10.1080/1331677X.2022.2080733.
Testa, F., Gusmerottia, N. M., Corsini, F., Passetti, E., & Iraldo, F. (2016). Factors affecting environmental management by small and micro firms: The importance of entrepreneurs’attitudes and environmental investment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(6), 373–385. doi:10.1002/csr.1382.
Xiao, G., & Shen, S. (2022). To pollute or not to pollute: Political connections and corporate environmental performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 74, 102214.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102214.
Xu, X., Yan. Y. (2020). Effect of political connection on corporate environmental investment: evidence from Chinese private firms. Applied Economics, 27(18).  1515-1521. doi:10.1080/13504851.2019.1693692
Yang, D., Wang, A. X., Zhou, K. Z., & Jiang, W. (2019). Environmental strategy, institutional force, and innovation capability: A managerial cognition perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(4), 1147–1161. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3830-5.
You, D., Zhang, Y., & Yuan, B. (2019). Environmental regulation and firm eco-innovation: Evidence of moderating effects of fiscal decentralization and political competition from listed Chinese industrial companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 1072–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.106.
Zhang, D., & Guo, Y. (2019). Financing R&D in Chinese private firms: Business associations or political connection? Economic Modelling, 79, 247–261. doi:10.1016/j.econmod. 2018.12.010.
Zhang, J., (2017). Do political connections buffer firms from or bind firms to the government? A study of corporate charitable donations of Chinese firms. Organization Science, 27(5), 1307–1324. doi:10.1287/orsc.2016.1084.
Zhang, J., Yang, Z., Meng, L. & Han, L. (2022). Environmental regulations and enterprises innovation performance: the role of R&D investments and political connections. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 4088–4109. doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01606-7.
Zhang, Q., Yu, Z., & Kong, D. (2019). The real effect of legal institutions: Environmental courts and firm environmental protection expenditure. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 98, 102254. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102254.
Zhou, K. Z., Gao, G. Y., & Zhao, H. (2017). State ownership and firm innovation in China: An integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2), 375–404. doi:10.1177/0001839216674457.
 
 
 
 
Innovation Economic Ecosystem Studies
Volume 5, Issue 2
June 2025
Pages 141-158

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics