اثر نوآوری بر بهره‌وری: مطالعه موردی کشورهای در حال توسعه

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار اقتصاد، دانشکده کسب‌و‌کار و اقتصاد دانشگاه خلیج فارس، بوشهر، ایران

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

یکی از عوامل مهم اثر گذار بر بهره وری، نوآوری و تحولات تکنولوژِی است. در واقع نوآوری برای افزایش بهره وری ضروری است و تبدیل ایده های جدید به راه حل‌های اقتصادی جدید (محصولات، فرآیندها و خدمات جدید) اساس مزیت های رقابتی پایدار برای شرکت‌ها است. هدف این مطالعه بررسی رابطه نوآوری و بهره وری در کشورهای در حال توسعه است. بدین منظور از روش داده‌های تابلویی برای دوره زمانی 2011 - 2019 استفاده شده است. در این مطالعه از متغیرهای نوآوری، بهره وری، شاخص آمادگی فناوری مرزی، هزینه های عمومی آموزش و شاخص ظرفیت‌های تولیدی و تولید ناخالص داخلی استفاده شده است. نتایج الگو نشان می‌دهد نوآوری با بهره وری رابطه مثبت و معنادار دارد. پارامتر تخمین زده شده نوآوری برابر 0.16 است که بیانگر این است که یک درصد افزایش در نوآوری ، بهره‌وری 0.16 درصد افزایش می‌یابد. همچنین شاخص آمادگی فناوری اثر مثبت و معنادار بر بهره وری دارد. آمادگی فناوری موجب ایجاد رفاه و موقعیت‌های شغلی جدید و همچنین افزایش رقابت پذیری صنایع در عرصه داخلی و بین المللی می شود و اثر مثبت آن مطابق انتظار تئوریک تحقیق است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Innovation on Productivity: A Case Study of Developing Countries

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hadi Keshavarz 1
  • Reza Bakhshi 2
1 Assistant Professor of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics University of Persian Gulf, Bushehr, Iran
2 M.A student in economic, Faculty of Economic, University of Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

One of the critical factors affecting productivity is innovation and technology. In fact, innovation is necessary to increase productivity, and the transformation of new ideas into new economic solutions (new products, processes, and services) is the basis of sustainable competitive advantages for companies. Many studies have investigated the relationship between productivity and innovation. Some of these studies have found a positive relationship between innovation and productivity, and some have not found a significant relationship between the two. According to the recent contents, this study seeks to examine the relationship between innovation and productivity in developing countries. For this purpose, the panel data method has been used for the period from 2011 to 2019. The results of the model show that innovation and productivity have a positive and significant relationship. The estimated parameter of innovation is equal to 0.16, which indicates that a one percent increase in innovation increases productivity by 0.16 percent. Also, technology readiness index has a positive and significant effect on productivity. Technological readiness creates prosperity and new job opportunities, as well as increasing the competitiveness of industries in the domestic and international arena, and its positive effect is in accordance with the theoretical expectation of the research.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • innovation
  • productivity
  • developing countries
  • panel data

مراجع

احمدی، عباداله (1394). رابطه خلاقیت و نوآوری با بهره‌وری منابع انسانی. فصلنامه رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی، 7(3)، 27.
بزازان، فاطمه؛ شیرین بخش ماسوله، شمس‌اله؛ شوکتی تبریزی، پریسا (1399). بررسی نقش نوآوری بردرآمد گردشگری کشورهای اسلامی D-8. دو فصلنامه سیاستگذاری پیشرفت اقتصادی دانشگاه الزهرا (س)، 7(2)، 20.
مهرجردی؛ محمدرضا، کرونی، زهرا؛ ضیاء آبادی، مریم (1395). تاثیر نوآوری بر صادرات کشاورزی و صادرات کل ایران،  اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه، 24(93) ، 498.
علی‌محمدی، علی‌محمد؛ عبدی، مجید؛ رضایی، ناصر؛ ادیبیان، مهدی (1395) ارتباط نوآوری و بهره‌وری اقتصادی بنگاه‌های فعال در بخش دفاعی. فصلنامٍه علمی پژوهشی مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی دفاع ملی، 2(7)، 218-201.
نوروزی، فرخ نونژاد؛ ابراهیمی، مسعود؛ خداپرست، مهرزاد؛ شیرازی، جلیل (1400) بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر رشد بهره‌وری در ایران با استفاده از الگوریتم شبکه‌های عصبی مصنوعی، پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی 11(42)، 58 – 35.
شاهین‎پور، علی؛ کارابولو، کرم (1401) ارائه مدل تأثیر متغیرهای اقتصادی بر بهره‌وری کل در ایران، مدیریت بهره‌وری 16(1). 301-279.
Acs, Z. J, Braunerhjelm, P, Audretsch, D. B, & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge
spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small business economics, 32(1), 15-30.
Ahmadi, Ebadollah (2014). The relationship between creativity and innovation and the productivity of human resources. Scientific-research quarterly of a new approach in educational management, 7(3), 27. (In Persian).
Ali Mohammadi, Ali Mohammad; Abdi, Majid; Rezaei, Naser; Adibian, Mehdi (2015). The relationship between innovation and economic productivity of companies active in the defense sector. Scientific Quarterly of National Defense Strategic Management Studies, 2(7), 201-218. (In Persian).
Amini, Maryam; Farahmand, Shkoufeh (1400). Spatial analysis of the spillover effect of innovation and research and development on regional growth in Iran. Economic Research (Scientific Journal), 55(4), 761-780. (In Persian).
Arora, A., Athreye, S., Huang, C., 2016. The paradox of openness revisited: Collaborative
innovation and patenting by UK innovators. Research Policy 45(7), 1352–1361.
Bazazan, Fateme; Shirin Bakhsh Masuleh, Shamsoleh; Shaukti Tabrizi, Parisa (2019). Investigating the role of innovation in the tourism revenue of Islamic countries D-8. Al-Zahra University Economic Development Policy Quarterly (S), 7(2), 20. (In Persian).
Beers, C., & Zand, F. (2014). R & D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: an empirical analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2) 292–312.
Carlsson, B., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Braunerhjelm, P. (2009). Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: a historical review. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1193-1229.
Cassiman, B., Valentini, G. (2016). Open innovation: are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary? Strategic management Journal, 37, 1034–1046.
Crépon B, Duguet E, Mairesse J. (1998). Research, innovation and productivity: an econometric analysisat the frm level. Econ Innov New Technol, 7, 115–158.
Crespi, G and Zuniga, P. (2011). Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries, IDB Working Paper No. 74.
Crespi, G., Garone, L. F., Maffioli, A., & Stein, E. (2020). Public support to R&D, productivity, and spillover effects: Firm-level evidence from Chile. World Development, 130, 104948.
Denicolai, S., Ramirez, M., Tidd, J. (2016). Overcoming the false dichotomy between internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition: Absorptive capacity dynamics over time. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 57-65.
Duguet, E. (2004). Are R&D Subsidies a Substitute or a Complement to Privately Funded
R&D? An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level. Revue d‟ Economie Politique, 114(2), 245–274.
Erdal, L., & Goçer, € I. (2015). The effects of foreign direct investment on R _ &D and innovations: panel data analysis for developing Asian countries. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 195(3), 749-758.
Ghasem E., Qadri, F and Abbasioun, M. (2021). Investigation of the role of innovation intermediary in the relationship between the implementation of strategy and the performance of start-up businesses), the fourth national conference of entrepreneurship in Tehran - Sharif University of Technology, 5(60), 300-531. (In Persian).
Goldman, S., R. Nagel, and K. Preiss. (1995). Agile Competitors and Virtual Organisations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 92-116.
Hall, B. H., Moncada-Paternò-Castello, P., Montresor, S., Vezzani, A. (2016). Financing
constraints, R&D investments and innovative performances: new empirical evidence at the firm level for Europe, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(3), 183-196.
Hall, B. H., Sena, V. (2017). Appropriability mechanisms, innovation, and productivity: evidence from the UK. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(1-2), 42-62.
Hall, B.H., Lotti, F., Mairesse, J., (2013). Evidence on the impact of R&D and ICT investmentson innovation and productivity in Italian firms. Economics of Innovation and NewTechnology 22(3), 300–328.
Kaiser, U. (2002). Measuring knowledge spillovers in manufacturing and services: an empirical assessment of alternative approaches. Research Policy, 31(1), 125-144.
Link, A. N., Scott, J. T., (2019). The economic benefits of technology transfer from US federal laboratories. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–11.
Lööf, H., Heshmati, A. (2006). On the Relation between Innovation and Performance: A
Sensitivity Analysis, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15, 317-344.
Mehrjordi; Mohammad Reza, Taha; Karoni, Zahra; Zia Abadi, Maryam (2013). The impact of innovation on agricultural exports and total exports of Iran, Agricultural Economics and Development, 24(93), 498. (In Persian).
Mohnen, P., and B. H. Hall. (2013). Innovation and Productivity: An Update, Eurasian Business Review 3 (1): 47–65.
Mohnen, P., Polder, M., & van Leeuwen, G. (2018). ICT, R&D and organizational innovation: exploring complementarities in investment and production (No. w25044).
Nieto, M., Quevedo, P. (2005). Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort. Technovation, 25(10), 1141-1157.
Nowrozi, F.; Ebrahimi, M.; Khodaperast, M.; Shirazi, J. (1400) Investigating factors affecting productivity growth in Iran using artificial neural networks algorithm, Economic Growth and Development Research 11(42), 58-35. (In Persian).
Piva, M., and M. Vivarelli. (2002). The Skill Bias: Comparative Evidence and an Econometric Test.”International Review of Applied Economics 16 (3): 347–357.
Raffo, J., S. Lhuillery, and L. Miotti. (2008). Northern and Southern Innovativity: A Comparison across European and Latin American Countries.” The European Journal of Development Research 20: 219–239.
Roper, S., J. Du, and J. H. Love. (2008). Modelling the Innovation Value Chain, Research Policy 37:961–977.
Roper, S., Love, J. H., & Bonner, K. (2017). Firm's knowledge search and local knowledge externalities in innovation performance. Research Policy, 46(1), 43-56.
Saifullahi, N.; Hamidzadeh A. (1400). Analysis of the effect of knowledge management and market orientation on market performance with the mediating role of open innovation (research sample: Tejarat Bank). Strategic Management and Organizational Knowledge Quarterly, 4(12), 89-122. (In Persian).
Savin, I. and Mundt, P. (2022). Drivers of productivity change in global value chains: Reallocation vs. innovation, Economics Letters, 220, 110878.
Savin, I., Letyagin, D., (2022). Estimating the role of labor resources reallocation between sectors on the growth of aggregate labor productivity in the Russian economy. R-Economy 8, 57–67.
Shahinpour, A.; Karabolo, K. (1401). Presenting the model of the effect of economic variables on total productivity in Iran, Productivity Management 16(1). 301-279. (in Persian).
Taqwa, M.; Mansouri, T.; Faizi, K.; Akhgar, B. (2015). Fraud detection in bank card transactions using parallel processing of anomalies in big data. Information Technology Management Quarterly, 8(3), 498-477. (In Persian).
Zaccaria A., Cristelli M., Kupers R., Tacchella A. and Pietronero, L. (2016). A case study for a New Metrics for Economic Complexity: The Netherlands”, Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination 11(1), 151-169.
 
 
فصلنامه مطالعات زیست بوم اقتصاد نوآوری
دوره 3، شماره 3
آذر 1402
صفحه 1-16

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار